|
|
Past Messages from Doc Rosey!
Year 2003
|
01/03:
Top
IT IS APPARENT THAT WHAT EVER MY MESSAGE SUGGESTS SEEMS TO FALL ON 'DEAF EARS.' IT'S OBVIOUS THAT THE IMPACT UPON MOST INDIVIDUALS IS CLEARLY OFFSET BY WHAT'S CURRENT. THAT IS WHO IS 'CALLING THE SHOTS.' AFTER ALL IS SAID AND DONE WHAT SIGNIFICANCE DOES ANY INDIVIDUAL, LET A LONE A SMALL GROUP OF DEDICATED INDIVIDUALS, HAVE WHEN UP AGAINST WHAT IS SPEWED FORTH BY THE MAJOR PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUPS, LET ALONE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SPENT BY THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY, IN SHAPING PUBLIC OPINION. WE ARE, THUS, VICTIMS OF 'POPULAR' INFORMATION AND THEREBY FORCED TO 'KEEP UP WITH THE JONESES.'
WE ARE NOT REALLY 'KEEPING UP WITH THE JONESES,' BUT AS PART OF
MOB RULE ,"NOT WILLING TO MAKE WAVES AND ROCK THE BOAT." THUS, WHEN A
'DOUBTING THOMAS' COMES UP WITH AN ALLEGED NEW IDEA, WHICH MAKES SENSE
IT EVENTUALLY FALLS TO THE WAY SIDE AS BEING A 'GOOD IDEA.'
BUT OVERWHELMING CONTROLLED EXPERIENCES AS A WAY OF LIFE LEADS TO THE
BEST AND IN SOME INSTANCES FOR THE BETTERMENT OF SOCIAL
EXISTENCE VANISHING.
AGAIN FOR THE UMPTHIETH TIME, I SUGGEST THAT SURVIVAL IS AN
INHERENT QUALITY, THAT FROM OUR VERY INCEPTION IS ROOTED INTO NATURE'S
SCHEMES, WHICH PROMOTE SURVIVAL BY SUSTAINING THE GIFT OF LIFE. OUR
INCEPTION WHICH EVOLVES FROM THE ACT OF SPERMATOGENESIS ON ONE HAND AND
THAT OF OOGENESIS ON THE OTHER, WHICH TRIGGERS LIFE FROM THE SPERM
PENETRATING THE OVA (EGG). THIS INHERENT FUNCTION HAS BEEN HANDED DOWN
OVER THE EONS AS A MEANS TO PROMOTE SUCCEEDING GENERATIONS.
WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED ACTION, LIFE IS SUSTAINED BY NATURAL
COMPONENTS THROUGH PURE PROTEINS, FAT, CARBOHYDRATE MOLECULES AND
INTRODUCTION BY THE MATERNAL FACTOR OXYGEN CARRYING AIR AND WATER. THERE
FORTHWITH ARE THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS, WHICH AS DEEDED BY OUR
NUCLEOTIDES AS EXEMPLIFIED BY RIBONUCLEOTIDES SUCH AS DNA, RNA AND
TRANSFERRING FACTORS OR MESSAGE TRANSMITTERS DETERMINE WITHIN EACH CELL
INSTANTANEOUS OVER A HUNDRED THOUSAND, POSSIBLY ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY
THOUSAND CHEMICAL CONVERSIONS. WHY, TO SUSTAIN WHAT WE ACKNOWLEDGE AS
THAT GREAT GIFT, LIFE!!!
WE DO NOT EXIST AS ISOLATED ENTITIES. NOT
ONLY ARE WE AS A CONGLOMERATE OF BILLIONS OF CELLS DEPENDED UPON OUR
SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT BUT UPON THAT WHICH RELATES TO OUR INTERNAL
CELLULAR ENVIRONMENT FOR SURVIVAL IN MAINTAINING AN EFFICIENT SYSTEM
DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN A BALANCE, THAT IS HOMEOSTASIS, BETWEEN THE
OPPOSING ENVIRONS. IT IS A FACT OF LIFE, WHICH BIOCHEMICALLY SUGGESTS,
THAT IT IS A NATURAL DICTATE, THAT WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUSTAINING
IMMUNE FUNCTION AS WELL AS RESPONSIBLE ENVIRONMENT HARMONIOUS CONTROL OF
WHAT IS DEEMED NEEDED TO MAINTAIN THE GIFT, LIFE. WE ARE TO PRONE TO
LEAVING THE CARE OF OUR LIFE'S TO 'OTHERS.' WHY? WE ARE INFUSED WITH THE
IDEA, THAT SOME GURU (GEE YOU ARE YOU), HEALTH PURVEYOR, SUCH AS A
PHYSICIAN, LEGISLATOR, EXECUTIVE OR JUDICIARY AGENT WILL PROTECT US.
LET'S FACE FACTS, BY LEAVING OUR ACTIONS, THAT IS BEHAVIORAL AND
PHYSIOLOGIC TO 'OTHERS' TO CORRECT OUR FAILINGS, LEAVES US VICTIMS OF
NEGLECTING THAT WHICH HAS BEEN LAID OUT BY NATURE. PHARMACEUTICALS REAP
UNTOLD MILLIONS, LET ALONE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS BY ALL TOO OFTEN OUR
BIOLOGICAL INDISCRETIONS. FOR GOD'S SAKE TAKE A LOOK AT PHYSICIANS DESK
REFERENCE (PDR) AND PAY HEED TO THE SIDE AFFECTS, ADVERSE REACTIONS AS
EFFECTS FROM FDA APPROVED TOXIC PHARMACEUTICALS. NOW, LET'S ADD
NEUTROCEUTICALS TO THE LIST.
HUMAN INVENTIVENESS, CONSTANTLY, IS UNCONTROLLED ATTEMPTS TO OUT
WIT OR THE EGOTISTICAL BELIEF THAT 'WE CAN EVOLVE SOLUTIONS,' FOR ALL
OUR DEEDS. WE KNOW LESS THAN 5 % OF WHAT BIOCHEMICAL ATTRIBUTES
CONSTITUTE SUSTAINING NORMAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING. WITH THIS
REALIZATION, HUMAN ATTEMPTS TO UP STAGE NATURE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR
EONS. HAVE WE SUCCEEDED, NOT REALLY!
HERE, WE IN A "MODERN" ERA, WITH MORE PROMISES TO TAKE CARE OF
OUR FAILINGS, WHICH REVOLVE ABOUT FALSE PREMISES THAT THERE'S "ALWAYS A
SOLUTION." OVER THE EONS WE SEEN ALCHEMIST, SUCH AS KING ARTHUR'S
MERLIN, PONCE DE LEON'S SEARCH FOR "THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH," PLASTIC
SURGERY WITH NIPS AND TUCKS, LIPO-SUCTION, SURGICAL BY-PASS, TRANSPLANTS
OF NEARLY EVERY ORGANS, NOW CLONING AND GOD KNOWS HOW MANY "NEW
DISCOVERIES" LIE AHEAD, BUT WITH IT ALL THERE'S NO RESOLUTIONS. NEW
GURUs APPEAR, 'NEW' DISCOVERIES ARE IF NOT FOUND TODAY ARE 'JUST AROUND'
THE CORNER OR AT "THE END OF THE RAINBOW." AND WHEN IT'S IS ADDED UP,
WHAT'S 'NEW TODAY' HAS, ALREADY, FALLEN TO THE WAYSIDE. TOMORROW'S
PROMISES ARE AS EVER YESTERDAYS FAILURES. "THERE'S NOTHING NEW UNDER THE
SUN," OTHER THAN RENEWING ANOTHER GENERATION, WHICH FAILS TO PAY HEED TO
THOSE WHO SURVIVED THE PAST.
FACE FACTS, WE ARE THE VICTIMS OF OUR OWN FAULTS. THERE ARE NO
COURSES, WHICH REFLECT THE SIGNIFICANCE AS RELATES TO RESPONSIBLE
NUTRITIONAL INTAKES DEVOID OF REFINED FOODS SUCH AS WHITE FLOUR, OILS,
SUGARS AND FOOD TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERED FOODS. WE ARE WHAT WE EAT.
CHEMICALS, WHICH SATISFY TASTE, EYE APPEAL, TEXTURE AND A HOST OF
PRESERVATIVES, COLORING AS WELL AS RELATIVES OF AUTOMOTIVE ANTIFREEZE
ARE FOISTED UPON US. THESE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARE DETRIMENTAL, AND
NOT INFREQUENTLY, SET US UP FOR PATHOLOGY, BUT WRECK OUR FUTURE INDUCED
SPERMATOGENETIC AND OOGENETIC CREATIONS.
SURGEONS UNDERTAKE WONDERFUL TECHNOLOGIC SKILLS, WHICH CAN OFFSET
MANY ACUTE AND CHRONIC INDUCED PATHOLOGY, BUT WHEN'S THE LAST TIME YOU
HAVE BEEN ADVISED AS TO APPROPRIATE DIETS, LET ALONE PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES
BY THEY OR THEIR STAFFS, LET ALONE THE HOSPITAL PERSONNEL, IN SUGGESTING
WELL QUALIFIED PROGRAMS? LET'S NOT LEAVE OUT 'OTHER' PROFESSIONALS, WHO
WE ACCORD HONORS IN TAKING CHARGE OF OUR GIFT, LIFE, WHO ARE INFUSED
WITH MANIPULATING TOXIC FDA CONTROLLED PHARMACEUTICALS AND NOW
NEUTROCEUTICALS AS 'NEEDED' BY WE WHO 'TRUST' THEIR TAKING CHARGE.
LET'S FACE IT BY ACCEPTING THE HONOR OF SUSTAINING OUR GIFT, LIFE
IS PRODUCTIVE, WHEREAS WHEN 'ALL IS SAID AND DONE,' LEAVING THE PATHWAY
THROUGH 'OTHERS' TAKING CHARGE, IS FRAUGHT WITH SELF-NEGLECT.
SMOKING, DRINKING, SOCIAL DRUGS, LIVING "HIGH ON THE HOG"
TOGETHER WITH FAILING TO RESPECT AGING AND WITH IT SUSTAINING IMMUNE
FUNCTION BY BIOCHEMICAL INDIVIDUALIZING OUR INHERENT QUALITIES LEAVES
ONE WITH HANDICAPPING EFFECTIVE QUALITY OF DAILY LIFE EXISTENCE AND
PERFORMANCE.
THIS YEAR, AS YOU MAKE YOUR RESOLUTIONS, MAKE TAKING CHARGE OF
GOD'S GIFT, LIFE, YOUR FOREMOST PROMISE. THE BENEFITS WILL BE
REWARDING!!
GOD BLESS AMERICA,
DOC
ROSEY
|
02/03 Top
CMDR. DR. HAROLD ROSENBERG
|
03/03 Top
ARE WE PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK,
|
|
04/03 Top
HOW MANY WILL DIE? I’m one of the alleged Tom Brokaw ‘Greatest Generation’ WW II veterans. I have avoided watching the TV and media sanctioned ‘spying,’ which exposes our military to the scrutiny of many eyes, not only patriotic Americans, but to ‘all’ others. In other words the lessons of the past, which were designed to preserve the security of our military personnel are now an open book to all, especially adversaries. Military excursions as carried out in the past were based on secrecy. During WW II there were posters designed to warn as to ‘ a slip of the lip,’ ‘the enemy is listening,’ and to ‘nail down security’ martial law was in effect. There were no ‘peaceniks,’ nor ‘Monday morning quarter backers,’ but plain ‘down to earth’ military communiqués. What in the earth is going on? Must we sit on the side as if at a sporting event cheering and groaning at the every move of our military forces. Must we satisfy the opponents and so-called coalition by signaling our intention? At what point does reality set in and with it the message is clear. There it was a ‘secured’ village of over two days reflecting a scenario whereby Marines were stopped ‘dead in their tracks.’ Mind you, I up to this interval avoided the media, that is Hollywood designed information tactics. There lying prone appeared to be a platoon of well-armed Marines, who were probably involved in checking out the positions security. What, I gathered was that small arms fire from distant buildings had been heard. Now the media came into play, ‘ohing’ and ‘ahing’ at the events taking place. Wow, there they are ‘hunkered’ down with some non-com shouting, “Stay down, don’t move your buts.” Like disciplined soldiers they stayed glued motionless for at least one hour. No time to think, move or even procrastinate as to what’s going on. Back home the media was sensationalizing the event. “Holy cow this is the real thing.” Two retired officers, as TV media consultants, departing from ‘real’ tactics praised what was going on. What praise? Praising a bunch of armed individuals gluing tactics, which brought groveling to a stand still by a few small-armed fired shots, while waiting for the next level of command. Hell, I thought, “This must be calling for satellite instructions from a higher power, no doubt the big boss, General Franks.” Hell the world the media must be involved. There was the moderator analyzing ‘this world-renowned’ event as to ‘what’s up doc.’ From the comfort of the studio our ‘second-guessing’ geniuses were via satellite consulting every “Tom, Dick and Harry” as to the merits of these ‘amazing’ tactics, notwithstanding the question, “ was you there Charlie.” Holy Hannah here comes the tanks. Satellite consultation, let’s not leave out the PCs and laptops, which have decisioned, that tanks, not airpower were called for. Great idea. Still, how come Battalion at the least or company determination should have held sway by rapid decisions as ingrained through military experiences, which reflect from time-in-memorial ground warfare. What was going on relates to WW II tactics of our soldiers versus them. Now, ‘thank God’ the tanks responded, but what’s this they have slowed down and even came to a halt at least several hundred yards from adversary forces. Mind you, there has been small-arms fire and estimates between 4-5 Iraqi and as much a 120 via media estimates. Come on already, hit that position with heavy tank fire. A round or two of armor piercing and anti-personnel fire will dispatch the resistance. In the mean time, our Marines are still hunkered down in exactly the same position as the minutes keep ticking away. What’s this, there are four ‘sophisticated’ well armed-tanks firing machine gun rounds. Come on, hit them with the heavy guns. Show them, the estimated 4-5 at most 120 Iraqis, who is boss! Machine gun incessant firing and eventual the heavy guns were not followed up by those still hunkered down immobile ‘boots’ advancing. I cut out and lay stewing in the ‘sack’ contemplating ‘how in the hell’ are we going to win. There’s no way with amateurish tactics that our forces can succeed with out encountering heavy losses of military personnel. To make it, even gloomier confining our actions to humanitarian rules by ‘surgical’ and awe bombings to minimize civilian losses, which reinforced by peaceniks promotes tragic losses despite our so-called ‘star-wars’ weaponry. Now add up that situation whereby a disgruntled 101st soldier, a Muslim, dispatches officers with hand grenades and the execution of at least a dozen of our guys, who are there to rebuild Iraq by so-called ‘defeated’ enemy. Surgical bombing, sparing civilians, who can observe from well lighted, TV functioning homes and accessory facilities when coupled with our home-brewed peaceniks are the ingredients for a disastrous campaign. Iraqis are seasoned in the throes of war, they know the ins and outs, which underscores that they have no restraints to what ever they decision to accomplish. We are facing blood letting by trying to satisfy world opinion as to our intentions. War is hell and with out glory, the successful accomplishment requires ‘a no holds, no gloves’ barring approach. There is no learning as you go positions as that of the aforementioned ‘hunkered down’ troops, but acceding to ‘time-honored’ values as infused in real, not star wars combat. What holds than, for example WW II, holds for now, “Shoot and ask questions later!” ABOVE ALL, DON’T REBUILD NOT UNTIL THE ENEMY HAS BEEN SQUASHED. THE LIVES OF OUR YOUTH ARE WHAT COUNTS. NOT SPARING AN ENEMY, NOR COMFORTING THEIR INTENT BY OUR DESIRES. LET’S NOT LIVE, LET ALONE SURVIVE IN A FOOLS PARADISE. GOD BLESS AMERICA AND WHILE AT IT THE WORLD. Doc Rosey, A Proud American HEALTH, RELYING ON OTHERS, IS THAT A GOOD IDEA? It’s at least five decades, which have gone by during my professional existence. In fact, six decades have gone by since a university professor declared, “Cancer will be resolved within ten years,” and yet the illusive search continues for answers! Biochemistry has advanced a bit, but with it all we have entered the scientific world of molecular and nuclear research. With it, we have ‘new’ tools to resolve promises of ‘cures.’ No matter human resolve, at least among learned scientists, is to probe, predict and resolve the mysteries of life. Yes, we have the ‘brains,’ thus ‘the where with it all’ to by-pass nature by opening up God’s ‘Pandora Box’ replete with ‘all the answers.’ Now in retrospect, if such is the case, than how come we humans after eons come up with ‘so-called’ solutions, which let so much yet to be resolved? We are as children dependent on the ‘learned’ for answers, which will sustain our hopes by ‘others.’ There’s nothing wrong with accepting leadership provided we are ‘convinced beyond a reasonable doubt’ they have the answers. Look, I as all others need qualified guidance and with it the confidence that as living entities, todays and tomorrows, are designed by human endeavors to ‘meet the tests of time,’ thus protecting our innocence to be born free, live free. Thus, as I limit the discussion to health, not necessarily political, albeit politics do impact our existence. What is lacking is the failure to emphasize through education from when we are ‘knee high’ the question of our natural physical defenses to pathology or disease. Here is the crux of our failed education to bring forth our individual responsibility in sustaining ‘the gift of life’ by leaving it to others. I read an opinion in the Courtlandt Forum (3/2003), which focused upon the subject “To Err Is Human, To Sue Is American.” It focused ‘on malpractice, job actions by physicians to protest rising liability insurance costs.’ And the question: Are physicians doing enough to combat professional error and deal with mal practice litigation-or, perhaps, are doing too much? The author revealed that the Institute of Medicine projected up to 98,000 deaths as relate to medical error in 2000! The medical and public interests to the contrary as relates to alleged mistakes, this my analysis, are concerned with ‘high costs’ of medical care and medical insurance’ (New England Journal of Medicine 347: 1933, 2003.). Get this according to the article,” Malpractice premiums are certainly on the rise-in a big way. Some obstetricians and surgical specialists are being charged $ 100000 or more a year for their liability coverage-at a time when reimbursements for medical services is stagnant or even on the decline, and practice overhead is increasing.” We are witnessing physicians leaving one state for another to contain costs and operate in a more ‘friendly’ environment. Others are packing it in with early retirement or just plain ‘dumping’ health care and adjusting to other social economic environments. It wouldn’t belong before, many practitioners just up and depart to more convenient lands or if they are immigrates; why not retrace their ethnic roots for comfort. They play the Malpractice Lottery, rather than returning to basics, is to grab ‘that pie’ in the sky and get compensated. The game plan, literally, is to dump every so-called error on the victimized practitioner and with it attains riches beyond their wildest dreams despite human cost to personal health. The solution has always been in our grasp. We, are biochemically individualized, which when coupled with social and economic status, sex, status as to education and with this individual ages, other factors as genetics, stress and strains, etc there exists unlimited variables, which upend “What’s good for the Goose isn’t necessarily good for the Gander. Recognizing that variants exist and even are not constant, places the burden in to each individual taking charge of their lives. By submitting to ‘others’ we are prone to a ‘catch as can’ choice when ‘push comes to shove.’ I am not decrying surgery or for that matter legal toxins as FDA approved pharmaceuticals and now neutriceuticals for despite ‘good intentions’ obstacles come with the variables impacting life. However, education starting when we’re knee high to a grasshopper or for that which the maternal object is tuned into sets the basics required to sustain vitality and promote immune function in that constant battle of maintaining a harmonious environmental existence between our cellular functions and that, which surrounds us. Now would it not be wiser to sustain our gift of life by taking charge of what we ingest, drink and breathe. As complex cellular organisms, we are the ‘keepers’ of the myriads of cells, which depend upon educated cooperation of the total organism, that signify who and what we are. This cannot be left to happenchance! Those who are ‘forced’ to take charge by our failures to do so or in the event of genetic or natural intrusions upon are beings should not be punished if we fail to take charge of our gift, LIFE. PREVENTION AS RELATES TO SURVIVAL MUST BE INDUCED IN OUR PARENTING AS GUARANTEES IN PRESERVING THAT GIFT. WE ARE WHAT WE EAT, BREATH, DRINK AND HOW WE PHYSICALLY PERFORM. To do otherwise is living in a Fool’s Paradise!! GOD BLESS AMERICA AND WHY NOT THE WORLD. MAY OUR MILITARY SUCCEED AND COME HOME SAFE AND SOUND.
PATRIOTICALLY
YOURS, |
|
05/03
Top It is an unbelievable task to focus the attention of the public on the significance of nutrition and exercise in sustaining our vital functions, significantly the immune system. Let's face facts as long as humans seek to out wit as well as ignore the essentials that nature has provided us in order to survive, there is but dead end ahead.
Our
concepts as to basics aside from reading, writing and arithmetic, which
are essentials in learning what constitutes the past, present and future
as openers to meeting experiences and with it all amassing knowledge,
which we strive to understand the lessons of the past in order to offset
future failures. But, despite our greatest intentions, we are left in
the dark when it comes to sustaining our greatest gift, that is our
life.
We have very
little if any direct involvements as individuals in assuming the
responsibilities as relates to 'what makes us tick.' A simple review of
our education as relates to our biochemical individuality evidences a
dearth of recognizing the significance of learning values as needed to
sustain our obligations to 'shoulder our responsibilities.'
We are with out
exception ignorant of what constitutes survival. When in the history of
our overall leaning processes have we been formally introduced let alone
been guided in 'real' values. Values, which place the burden of quality
of 'taking charge' of our gift, life as independent responsibilities. We
are trained in appropriate hygiene practices from infancy. But with it
all, there's no learning processes, which conveys that 'responsibility
to survive' as a learning process, thus setting forth survival as an
independent control, IS A MUST.
We are, as
far back as our existence, totally dependent upon 'others' to take
charge of our lives. Our entire attitude, thus, reflects that we can
rely on 'others' such as physicians and other health purveyors to
administer to our needs. With such an atmosphere enveloping our beings,
it is a small wonder that we survive.
Our
dependency, which is qualified by inept understanding, virtually leaves
our gift of life in the hands of 'learned' individuals. The final result
that evolves is that our neglect gets to depend on 'gods', that is
GURUS (gee you are you) , literally, experimenting with methods to
correct our failings. These strange forces make excellent livings as a
result.
Oh when they
fail, what's left is legal retribution in 'malpractice' suits a form of
malfeasance rewarding the victims as if playing a lottery.
Unfortunately, the wrong individual is sued. Each of us, as biochemical
individualized identities, are victims of our 'own neglect.' Only when
we 'fess up and recognize that our gains are never 'real' other than
measures being set aside by failing to take charge of our personal gift,
life. Leaving the rewards of inept concepts as to the basics of
sustaining our immune functions promotes misinformation and with it all
sets each individual up for countless pathologies.
All
pharmaceuticals are governable toxins, which in it self leaves a great
deal of uncertainty. Our dependency on 'weapons', that is governable
toxins, effects an endless search for 'cures.' Think it over when have
you, we ever felt that our goals to conquer disease has achieved the
ultimate? Let's face facts, there's never going to be a 'final'
solution, which depends upon manipulating molecules to solve failed
practices.
How many
nips, tucks, pharmaceuticals, neutriceuticals and a host of others
measures as for example genetic engineering are schedules to
'eventually' conquer what ails all? Historically, the search for ever
lasting youth, perpetual vitality and virility is endless. GURUS COME
AND GO and with it all 'unlimited' successes.
Resolution
will come when each individual accepts responsibility in 'taking
charge' of their great gift, LIFE!! Each individual has to be made aware
of their uniqueness in that the myriads of cells, which make up the
whole, can be harmonious living entities when indulging in sound
nutrition and exercise practices. YOU, DEFINITELY, ARE WHAT YOU EAT.
STOP BEATING ABOUT THE BUSH AND WITH IT ALL TAKE CHARGE OF YOUR LIFE!!
What a happy
day it will it be, if we accept GOD'S gift, life and trust nature.
When all is said and done, nature is the final determinant as to
survival not the human!!
GOD BLESS AMERICA,
DOC
ROSEY
|
|
06/03
Top
Despite the 'blind leading the blind' by failed assumptions, the majority continue to be led over the cliff. Why? Failed responsibilities of taking charge of our gift, LIFE and trusting others to effect 'cures' leaves the majority to 'holding an empty bag.' Death is a natural phenomena, but ignoring potentials, which are natural designed all too often leads to premature demise.
We
are what we are in the scheme of natural survival. Make no 'bones about
it,' we are what we eat' and how well we sustain through physical
measures our musculo-skeletal system. Thus, deterioration of survival is
expressed by personal neglect, which reveals pathology as relates to
cardiovascular, endocrine, immunologic, respiratory, neurologic, musculo-skeletal,
etc systems.
From
time in memorable, we have succumbed to failings, which center about the
belief that 1. We are capable of coming up with fore gone conclusions
that our human uniqueness can resolve all! 2.That our uniqueness can out
do nature's eons of experiences, which have 'honed' efficient
expressions of homeostatic balances between our surrounding (external)
and cellular (external) environments.
Manipulation of toxic chemicals ( pharmaceuticals ) are in reality poor
substitutes for maintaining survival, let alone establishing sound
health required for normal activities of daily living. Drugs are
manipulated as measure to alleviate symptoms and in the process do not
get to the root of the problem. In many instances as a palliative
measure, despite the health purveyors good intentions, the therapy masks
the potential causes.
What
do you think of the alleged 'cure' as professed by ingesting Food and
Drug Administration's approval of governable toxins? First off there's
side effects, which can be mild to life threatening through prescribed
as well as over the counter drugs. Than, there is the natural phenomena
of healing through immune functions. Indeed, over a period of time,
pharmaceuticals can be neutralized by the latter.
After all, survival is totally dependent upon immune regulation as
relates to DNA and its side kick RNA in maintaining homeostasis (
balance) between the internal( cell) and external environment. All
toxins must be modified or destroyed in sustaining cellular vitality.
Let us face it, we evolved from single cells into a complex organism
whereby, cells have taken on specific functions whereby they are
organized into selective tissue, which synergistically support their
survival. A single cell, as for example an amoeba or bacterium, has all
the qualities within its self to sustain survival as well as propogate
new generations. In fact, the single cell is totally dependent
upon its innate qualities to survive. It does not hand its survival over
to "OTHERS," there is no health purveyors available, other than its self
to survive.
Single cells once incorporated into a complex organism such as a human,
must in order to survive establish tissues, as noted, through symbiotic
relationships. Thus, evolves cardiovascular organs to propel about
nutrients and wastes. Musulo-skeletal to promote physical
activities. Gastrointestinal properties to absorb essential nutrients
and expel wastes. Hepato-renal to filter, balance nutrients such as
minerals, promote cholesterol determined hormones as i.e estrogen
(female), testosterone (male), vitamin D, aldosterone. The latter are
needed for propagation, strong bones, overall biochemical functions.
Abuse of these by foolishly taking them in order to sustain vitality,
burdens a system of biochemical events, which nature has devised to
maintain survival. Hormones out of context, that is purpose, can lead to
dire circumstances, not with standing malignancies and through it all
the core of the body continues to age, which no amount of camouflage
through surgery cosmetics or 'extreme make-overs' can offset human
characteristics to leave our gift, LIFE to others.
A
final thought. The surgeon, admirably, renders a fine result! But, when
viewed as an end result, the incision, the removed offending
tissues, plastic innovation are healed for better or worse by natural
interventions. No matter how great the skill, the intent, that is
intervention, the end result is mastered by nature. HEALING IS A NATURAL
PHENOMENA. NO MATTER OF SKILL CAN BE EFFECTIVE IF NATURE IS LEFT OUT
AND DEPENDS UPON LEAVING OUR GIFT, LIFE TO "OTHERS."
This
is but a small segment as to the significance of survival. NO AMOUNT OF
'HYPE' CAN OFF SET THAT WHICH IS REQUIRED. What is needed as a priority
is to start at an early stage of life, indeed not just with the infant
but with the maternal and masculine objects to promote education as well
as maximizing individual responsibilities. YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT AND HOW
YOU PROMOTE PHYSICAL AWARENESS AS TO SURVIVAL. TAKE CHARGE, DO NOT LEAVE
YOUR GIFT OF LIFE TO OTHERS!! PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE IS THE ANSWER AND
WITH IT ALL RESPECTING NATURE.
GOD BLESS AMERICA,
DOC
ROSEY
|
|
7/03
Top
It's tough being a lone voice when it comes
to spreading a message. And to worsen matters the ongoing assault on
consumers by archaic promises as to 'cures,' which promise to sustain
health, rid us of malignancies, heart attacks, myocardial infarcts and a
host of other diseases. The 'modern' witch doctors have all the answers,
but if such is true than how come we still are victims of disease
states, which go back eons. Not, only, do the years disappear, but the
promised successes are today as much of the same hallow promises of
yesterday.
The promises of Ponce De Leon's perpetual
youth and that of yesteryears alchemists, such as King Arthur's Merlin
have no more merit than today's pharmacologists. Disease continues to
attach relentlessly with out any let up. Doctors have limited answers
other than the century old belief that they will outshine Nature, that
is Gods immune functions. Let's face it we relegate personal health care
to 'others' in the 'belief' they will save us. All we have, if the facts
get from behind the blinders, is a bag full of 'false hopes!'
Right under our noses we have seen the
weakening of antibiotic effects upon bacterial infections. Why? Bacteria
have immune functions, which preserve their vita performance through
nucleotides, not unlike human DA and RNA expressions. What does this add
up to? It's our inherent immune systems, which given the opportunity
neutralizes toxins from overwhelming cellular capabilities. Thus,
bacteria and not preclude viruses adapt rapidly through their
generations of neutralizing toxins, such as antibiotics. In fact,
bacteria eventually thrive in what was once their foes, FDA approved
toxins.
I have selected a few situations, which are
gleaned from current reports. They include scientific documents as well
as information relating to public consumption.
For over a decade scientific
journals, significantly geriatric, have attacked the relentless assault
on our elder citizens by polypharmaceuticals. What this represents is
the discovery of elder patients being given multiple prescriptions to
address 'a slew' of disease entities such as cardiovascular, arthritis,
anemic states, incontenance and a 'host' of others, which suggest
multiple symptoms as consequences from the 'aging' processes. To add to
polypharmaceuticals or multiple drugs is the confusion created by
patients being referred to as well as selecting caregivers from
countless specialties. The result is like one hand not aware of what the
other is doing. And so, do to autonomy of specialist and failure to
communicate with each other, you have individuals loaded up and taking
multiple FDA approved toxins. The end result is dangerous as these
polypharmaceutical wreck havoc with the innate immune system, with the
results severe impaired activities of daily function. Unfortunately, we
have come to believe that what is ensuing is related to aging, where as
uninhibited use of polypharmaceutical gets off "Scott free!"
Now comes a recent report in Family Practice
Recertification, VOL.25 NO. 6, June 2003. The editorial reports out as
"The victory of polypharmacy."
Quoting "Geriatric medicine has been forced
into a strategic retreat. Reducing the number of drugs that our elderly
patients take has become an unwinnable battle. The cardiologists have
defeated even the most intransigent of the beleaguered geriatrics
minimalists - among whom I am a now humbled charter member. Optimal
secondary and primary prevention of the major causes of mortality in the
elderly - cardiovascular disease- requires multiple drugs from multiple
classes: Statins, antihypertensive agents, Beta Blockers- angiotensin-converting-enzyme
inhibitors, agents for optimal diabetic control, and for some,
anticoagulants. With little imagination, the list could be expanded,
especially since patients with cardiovascular disease typically have
vascular disease and may require still other drugs."
Here we have what is a strong indicator as to
the reversal of health purveyors moving away from control of
polypharmaceuticals and entrapping the patient in the 'clutches' of
'modern' alchemists, which continue to impair natural immunological
capabilities, thereby straining with additional toxins its efficiency!
The key to all the 'hype' is the phrases,
which usher in 'new' products and are signified as " It may
cure," " It may or can hold promise." ARE YOU WILLING TO POLLUTE YOUR
BODY WITH QUESTIONS AS TO MAY, COULD OR SHOULD," BY SWALLOWING ALLEGED
PROMISES?"
REMEMBER EVERY DRUG IS A CONTROLLED
TOXIN. THIS MEANS YOU TAKE YOUR CHANCES AT CHEMICALS, WHICH LEAVE DOUBT
AS TO THE 'END RESULTS,' UP IN THE AIR. A FINAL NOTE ALL
DRUGS, NOT UNLIKE ANTIBIOTICS, EVENTUALLY FAIL THROUGH IMMUNE FUNCTION,
PROVIDED THE 'CONTROLLED' PHARMACEUTICALS DO NOT KILL THE VICTIM THAT IS
YOU. PHARMACEUTICAL WORK HAND IN HAND WITH MORBIDITY.
TAKE CHARGE OF YOUR GIFT, LIFE AND
ABOVE DO NOT LET OTHERS TAKE CHARGE. GO AT IT WITH EYES OPEN NOT OPEN
WHILE CLOSED!!!
PATRIOTICALLY
YOURS, |
|
8/03
Top Message 1.
Message 2.
PATRIOTICALLY
YOURS, |
|
Message 1:
As I
write these timely health sustaining material it becomes increasingly
certain that the public is non-receptive. What exists is slovenly
attempts through individual means to sustain their gifts, that of life.
There exists an unfortunate attitude, which turns over to others the
innate qualities of biochemical individual responses to their survival.
The 'road to sound health,' as well as individual need, is based on premises, which accord so-called authorities neglectful justification for each individuals self-serving responsibility. The media plays a formidable force in overwhelming our inherent qualities by suggesting countless new pharmaceuticals and now including neutriceuticals will allay each and as well as prevent pathology. The results belie the facts.
If
modern maneuvers involving controlled toxins and make no bones about it
all drugs, their extracts including engineered or manipulating chemical
structures, which promote 'new' formulations are in the main failed
attempts at sustaining vital functions!
Think it over, when have you ever had complete confidence that you have
in fact been 'cured.' In fact when 'others' are selected to take charge
of our lives, we are forever left in doubt as to their 'valued care.'
Every medication regardless of need has a limit to their potential
affectivity as relates to toxicity. With time the 'success' of a drug is
resisted by the inherent quality of natural cellular forces, which
neutralize toxins in order to sustain the harmonious effects between our
surrounding and internal cellular environments. This inherent action is
referred to as a homeostasis, which permits survival. 'Make no
bones' about natural forces in particular the immune system in
sustaining survival. We survive, only, with an intact immune system.
Our
inherent qualities for sustaining immune function is totally dependent
on what we eat and promoting an effective program of exercise. Survival
can not depend upon pharmaceuticals or neutriceuticals nor upon 'others'
taking charge, but on our biochemical individualized support in
maintaining our gift, LIFE!
The
repeated use of words as may help, may revive, the best of medicines,
wonder drugs, etc are false proclamations as relate to 'cures and
prevention. The use of 'may' is a relative expression, which denotes the
question as to probable success as well as failure. Thus in the final
analysis the end result is temporary relief.
Medicines as toxins are used basically to treat symptoms as well as
signs, but in the overall scheme of health care do not influence the
pathologic causes other than bringing about relief, which temporize the
real malady.
Aspirin as a toxin blocks cyclogenase, thus impeding clotting. This
toxic effect doesn't 'cure,' nor prevent strokes, but sustains bleeding.
Prolonging bleeding can lead to serious influences as hemorrhaging. Can
you imagine what will happen in the event of a cerebral hemorrhage? The
toxic effect can protract the bleeding, thus worsen a hemorrhage. The
same holds for a myocardial infarction. Using pharmaceuticals to enhance
errections can induce a cascade of unpleasant as well as serious side
effects. Is it worth potentially endangering ones life for sexual
gratification?
Every pharmaceutical and neutriceutical has side effects. When it comes
to drugs no two people have the same responses, but as to natural
effects all have idiocyncracies that vary in intensity as relate to our
inherent biochemical individualized responses. Look at the inserts which
accompany pharmaceuticals and note the remarks, which list side affects,
idiosyncrasies, incompatibilities, adverse reactions and with it all
determine if you are willing to ingest something which 'may' help.
As
long as we continue to invest our health care in the hands of 'others,'
we are left 'holding an empty bag!' Relief of signs and symptoms are
well and good, but in the long run sustains personal health neglect. You
owe it to the myriads of cells that make up our being to take charge of
our lives and in so doing nurture healthy cells. There is no
deficiencies in pharmaceuticals, but there damn well exists deficiencies
in nutrients. You are, only, healthy by recognizing that survival
depends on 'your taking charge' of your gift, life. Neglect in most
instances leaves survival in the hands of 'OTHERS.' Is that what you
want?
Message 2:
Dear reader, how well do you understand what sustaining one's gift of
life entails let alone means? I doubt that the significance of what
constitutes survival is understood by you. Why, the facts which impact
our knowledge is perverted by 'others' in taking over for what is our
negligence. We do not rely on our immune functions but upon naive
acceptance of promises for 'cures' as well as answers which are
slovenly perpetrated solutions upon our inept understanding of what
makes for survival.
From time immemorial, the human organism has depended upon alchemists
such as King Arthur's Merlin or Ponce De Leon's search for the
fountain of youth to fulfill promises, which would promote, cure and
in the main promote our survival. Despite it all, we in the long run
are 'left holding an empty bag' of salvation with no reasonable end.
Modern day alchemist as pharmaceutical chemists are forever searching
for 'cures' for what can be related to our neglect in sustaining sound
health practices. This search is a reflection of inept, let alone
addressing our health needs as relates to a lack of responsible
knowledge. What remains reflects profits gleaned by pharmaceutical and
neutriceutical technologists preying upon unwary individuals.
"Knowledge is rewarded with success as ignorance is with failure."
Medical function broaches this failure by our acceptance of
practitioners no less in care than a lowly 'witch doctor' Our trust in
'others' can leave our failure to sustain our biochemical
individualized lives in jeopardy.
We
are biochemical individualized, thus the needs of one doesn't reflect
that of others. Circumstances involving the inception of life from the
sperm unlocking what exists in the egg as well as the numerous other
stages from this initiating act include childhood, puberty, young
adults, older and the very elderly reflect on ending biochemical
effects upon our personal being. No two individuals, let alone
identical twins considering events experienced over a life time have
identical biochemical needs.
Pharmaceuticals are in the main governable toxins as regulated by Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) determinants. Considering this fact
burdens us with the fact we are not identical related in our responses
to administered drugs. "What's good for the gander is not good for the
goose." Thus, to accept that which works on a Tom, Dick, Harry or
Mary, Jane, Harriet does not reflect a joint venture, but a pattern of
accepting 'toxins' as being good for all.
Our biochemical individuality and the governing facts as relates to
stage of life, vocation, climate, stress and a host of other
environmental factors including existing pathologies compound
confusion as to what is the 'norm' in prescribing. Furthermore, when
considering not only biochemical individuality but immune functions
that regulate a 'harmonious' existence between our cellular and
external environments, we have essential factors, which reinforce our
individualized needs.
I
have yet to read a promotion of any drug, which emphasizes 'will cure'
other than 'may cure.' This very fact covers the industry's intent to
avoid misleading the public and thereby facing legal pursuits for
failed promises. Think of it the media directs your attention to
a new drug, which 'may cure' and you 'hook line and sinker' without
questions swallow a 'new drug.' Is this practical?
Our failed understanding of what constitutes taking charge of our
gift, life leaves us victims of the whims of 'others' in promoting
salvation. In the long run, we are our worse enemies and with it all
leave unchallenged those who have taken over. When left with an 'empty
bag' as a reflection of our failed responsibilities, it is important
that you ask questions as to the whyfores, needs and reasons for
agents, which subvert our inherent immune functions. After all
is 'said and done,' nature has provided us with an immune system
consisting of forces, which are designed to carry us through for
better or worse, hopefully better as depends upon our taking charge of
our gift, life and thereby forestalling 'others' from involving our
being.
Deficiencies in Pharmaceuticals do not exist, but 'damn well' does
deficiencies in nutrients. In appropriate nutrition evokes pathology
and with that neglect of others taking charge. Think of it
hospitalization is recognized as promoting malnutrition. Our neglect
to sustain our gift of life can lead to malnutrition, which when faced
with pathology is further impacted by hospital or qualified 'other's'
neglect sustaining malnutrition. A FINAL NOTE NUTRITION IS THE STEP
CHILD OF MEDICINE. Bare bones diets as evidenced by notional neglect
through institutions are guaranteed to 'short change' salvation, why
to curtail costs, thus sustain profits.
IS
THIS WHAT YOUR LIFE NEEDS? IS "IT MAY HELP," A SATISFACTORY SOLUTION
OR IS TAKING CHARGE OF YOUR GIFT, LIFE WHAT YOU WANT? BETTER DEPEND ON
THE LATTER.
PATRIOTICALLY
YOURS, |
|
For several years, I have attempted to awaken the public as to the status of pharmaceuticals as Federal Drug Administration (FDA) toxins. Toxins, no matter how you 'cut the cake' are dangerous to your health.
Pharmaceuticals are toxins, which basically are used to treat symptoms
as well as signs. What they reflect, in most instances, as 'therapeutic
agents are benefits, which evoke relief, at the expense of a 'cure.'
The
medical literature as set forth to health purveyors spell out failings.
The Physician Desk References (PDR) sets fourth chemical composition,
dosages, needs as well as adverse effects, contraindications and dangers
not only of these FDA approved toxins but counter influences as relate
to other drugs. Prescriptions when filled MUST CONTAIN THE
AFOREMENTIONED AS WARNINGS TO PROTECT THE PATIENTS AS WELL AS THE HEALTH
PURVEYORS. Unfortunately, all too many accept prescribed drugs with out
paying heed to insert 'WARNINGS.'
A recent
item in the New York Post (9/9/03) was headlined as "2 diabetes Rx's can
hurt heart" by Kate Sheehy. The article pointed out that "Popular drugs
used by 6 million Americans can cause heart failure and dangerous
lung-fluid build up in some patients, medical research warned today.
The two
drugs studied, Avandia and Actos , caused the dangerous symptoms in six
men with adult - onset diabetes who already had mild to moderate heart
and kidney ailments, reported a team of doctors from the University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
We are
all biochemical individualized. "What's good for the gander" is not
necessarily correct for others. The use of polypharmaceuticals, which is
related to treating multiple 'symptoms' increases adverse reactions on
one hand and on the other hand explodes existing, but yet undetected
pathologies into detrimental if not dangerous influences from dormant to
active stages.
As
individuals age so does their organs. Kidney, cardiac, respiratory,
endocrine, neurologic, musculo-skeletal, immune and total functions slow
down. In most instances the body adjusts to biochemical and physiologic
change, which efficiently sustains activities of daily functions.
Pharmaceuticals as governable toxins, which can push efficient
biochemical and physiologic functions into premature catastrophic
states.
It is
not the disease that kills, but the adverse reactions, which are denoted
by the FDA as governable toxins. Let's face it a little minuscule amount
of cyanide can kill no less than a suicidal dose of cyanide. I am not
inferring that all drug toxins can dramatically affect function such as
cyanide, but controlled adverse reactions, especially compounded by
multiple drug toxic reactions used therapeutically to suppress
numerous signs and symptoms can and will shorten your life!!
'You are what you eat' and paradoxically on
the other side of the coin 'you reap what therapeutic toxins sow!'
A final
note after years of attesting to the virtues of women prophylactic use
of estrogen and progesterone in forestalling cardio-vascular episodes
such as myocardial attacks, strokes, strengthening bones sustaining
youthful vitality as well as curbing menopause and sweating. A recent
rash of negative reports are beginning to fill the scientific as well as
the lay literature concerning hormone replacement therapies. In fact
cardio-vascular events, strokes and malignancies as breast, ovarian and
uterine are now reflected as being potentiated with hormone therapy,
which counters previous reports. We can, only, wonder as to how many
women 'bit the dust' from replacement therapies!
What price
must one pay to forestall graceful aging with hormone replacement
therapy? Is it worth undertaking? No! If you have your wits about you
and use your brain in a positive manner, you will come out a winner!
LEAVING YOUR HEALTH IN THE 'HANDS OF OTHERS' AND FAILING TO TAKE CHARGE
OF YOUR GIFT, LIFE, INVARIABLY IS REWARDED WITH PREMATURE PATHOLOGIES
AND WITH THAT, NOT INFREQUENTLY, A HORRIBLE DEATH!!
PATRIOTICALLY
YOURS, |
|
There is
never an end to misinformation as relates to the publics knowledge
concerning facts as relates to sustaining individual health. The average
individual neglects health by rewarding 'others' who intercede on their
behalf with what if the facts are spelled out 'fail the tests of time,'
they would shrug at the outcomes. Much of what can be blamed as failed
measures can be traced to 1. failure to promote education, which
reflects poor choices as relate to individual responsibility; 2. setting
aside responsibility to 'others,' who virtually function as 'priests' or
acclaimed as gurus. Thus, the inflexibility of individuals accepting
responsibility by turning to 'others' ends up 'holding an empty bag.'
There's HUGE FINANCIAL returns when individual responsibility falls to
the wayside. A prime example is the endless research, developing of
'new' drugs, which easily 'hood wink' misinformed individuals into
caving in to medical subterfuge and HYSTERICAL MEDICINE, which has NEVER
come up with answers as relates to the 'test of time.' ISN'T IT OBVIOUS
THAT WHEN ACCESSED ALL THAT IS PROMISED IS ALWAYS A REPLAY OF PAST
MEASURES. There exists an ongoing 'search' for answers. But if one takes
the time to research the results, they would recognize that despite
claims of success, the results of all the yesterdays are repeated in the
present as well as the expectant achievement in the tomorrows.
FDA
approved toxins as prescribed are for ever promises for the 'great
solution' to what ails us. Of course, if you pick at the so-called
results, you will note the continuous presence of a cautionary inclusion
to all offered promises, "IT MAY HELP." Then there is a bit of 'chickenery,'
by leaking out the side effects of imbibing these FDA approved toxins.
Why, to avoid legal responsibility! After all, you were warned and 'come
what may,' we are not responsible. God for bid that the public becomes
knowledgeable. This would 'open up eyes,' which were 'closed wide open'
to questioning as to the 'promised cures.' The result good bye profits
and with it the extinction of FDA regulations, which protect toxins as
legitimate therapies.
You may
say that pharmaceutical corporations are expending billions in research,
in testing the safety of their 'discoveries and with that they MUST BE
ON THE UP AND UP. THAT'S TRUE BUT WHEN RESEARCHED AS TO FINAL COSTS THE
PROFITS HUGELY OUT WEIGH WHAT ENDS UP AS A FINAL FDA APPROVED PRODUCT In
short, it is not giving that matters, but 'what's in it' as expressed as
CAPITAL GAINS.
Not long
ago, I was privileged to attend two conferences as Continual Medical
Education (CME) courses. There were meals offered up as well as free
lectures. In most instances top well credentialed medical
authorities lectured the groups. The audience consisted of actively
practicing physicians representing in the main general and family
practitioners. There were a large group of psychiatrists in attendance
as well.
In one
of the presentations, which revolved about depression, the lecturer
emphasized the use of a new antidepressant. The presentation was
outstanding. To add weight to the conclusions a well informed individual
reinforced the session by advocating measures to sustain government
control as well as financial rewards in being aware of how to maintain
patient satisfaction.
The
lecturer at one point in the presentation pointed out, "If you don't
prescribe an appropriate drug, the patient will take charge." The
warning never, this is my interpretation, let the patient 'off the
hook.'
I caught
the lecturer in a corridor and exclaimed, "You made an excellent comment
by suggesting the patient would take charge." He wasn't happy as he
looked at me with out emotion, when I concluded," It is great as to the
patient taking charge." This over rode the intended purpose financial
gain by 'others.' I didn't improve it by adding, that is suggesting, "
At least the patient was free from 'priests' who dictated their
destinies."
In the
other program, a 'new' product was being pushed to alleviate depression.
The audience of practitioners were able to remotely control responses to
questions as related to behavior and as to qualifications of
psychoparmaceutical approaches. The audience including yours truly were
mesmerized by the latest state of the art equipment. The techniques were
to get their responses with the purpose of revealing a marked change in
voting, which reflected that |
